Turning the Tides at Tees
Bringing the Tides, Capital and Delivery into Confluence.
How can we design the Tees Estuary as a coordinated investment and delivery ecosystem — not a collection of disconnected projects — so that nature recovery, regulatory compliance and industrial productivity are achieved together?
This DASH is not about generating more good ideas. It is about changing how the Tees Estuary is funded, governed and delivered.
Drawing inspiration from international supercluster models and emerging UK finance mechanisms, this DASH will prototype a Tees Estuary Supercluster:
a place‑based approach that aligns funders, industry, regulators and delivery partners around shared outcomes, with capital and responsibility clear from the outset.
Instead of starting with interventions and then searching for funding, this DASH reverses the logic:
- We start with buyers, funders, corporates and regulators
- We define the outcomes they need - and are willing to pay for
- We then deliberately design interventions, delivery models and governance to meet those drivers
The result is a deliverable, investable pipeline - not an aspirational wish‑list.
This DASH will bring together decision‑makers and capital holders with delivery partners across the estuary system, including:
- Northumbrian Water
- Regulators and statutory bodies
- Port authority and major industry
- Infrastructure and strategic asset owners
- Local authorities and landowners
- River trusts, fisheries and land managers
- NGOs, conservation charities and community voices
- Public, private and blended‑finance funders
- Define the Tees Estuary investment system
- Agree the functional scale of the estuary (river, estuary, coast, intertidal, catchment links)
- Identify priority system outcomes (nutrients, sediment, flood risk, biodiversity, climate resilience)
- Map who benefits from those outcomes — and who has a reason to pay for them
- Surface funder and buyer drivers
- Make explicit the regulatory, AMP, ESG, Net Zero, consenting and business drivers
- Clarify investment horizons, risk appetite and constraints
- Frame a set of outcome‑based challenge statements that capital will realistically support
- Design interventions around finance logic
- Co‑develop multi‑benefit interventions aligned to buyer needs
- Combine:
-
- delivery interventions
- aggregation mechanisms
- governance and monitoring
-
- Prioritise solutions that:
-
- improve water quality
- reduce sediment and dredging pressure
- lower flood and erosion risk
- support biodiversity recovery
- deliver economic and social value
-
- Build delivery and funding pathways
- Define who builds, who operates, who maintains, and who benefits
- Match interventions to the right type of capital:
-
- grants and catalytic funding
- blended finance
- outcome‑based payments
-
- Align delivery with AMP8 and other regulatory and investment cycles
- Identify regulatory, consenting, data and governance blockers — and who owns removing them
Teams will work around funder‑ and buyer‑led challenge statements, not generic themes.
Each team will produce:
- A clearly defined environmental or system outcome
- A viable intervention or package of interventions
- An identified funding route or buyer
- Named delivery and enabling partners
- A realistic timeframe to delivery
By the end of the DASH, we will have:
By the end of the DASH, we will have:
- A clear Tees Estuary Supercluster concept, including coordination and governance model
- A menu of outcome‑based investment opportunities, not isolated projects
- A prioritised shortlist of interventions deliverable within AMP8 and current funding windows
- A mapped Tees Estuary investment architecture, showing:
-
- who pays for what
- using which funding instruments
- at what stage of maturity
-
- Named organisations pledging leadership, funding or enabling support
- A high‑level roadmap setting out:
-
- what must change
- who is responsible
- when delivery can start
-
- Agreement on the formation and role of a Tees Estuary Restoration Board
- A collective pledge to progress delivery beyond the Festival
- A deliverable pipeline of nature‑based and hybrid interventions
- Clear routes to shift investment upstream, away from purely end‑of‑pipe solutions
- Better alignment between regulatory pressure, capital spend and environmental outcomes
- A practical mechanism to make AMP8 investment work harder by coordinating co‑funding
- Funders and corporates: credible, investable opportunities aligned to their drivers
- Regulators: coordinated, system‑level solutions rather than piecemeal compliance
- Industry and infrastructure owners: clarity, reduced risk and long‑term certainty
- Communities: tangible environmental, social and resilience benefits
- Nature: recovery at the scale required to be self‑sustaining
- Clearly defined roles and responsibilities in delivery
- Alignment around shared outcomes, not competing projects
- Ownership of barrier removal
- Commitment to work through a single coordinating forum for the Tees Estuary
